🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional district plan that is projected to include several five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and disturbing the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had determined that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts established after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

With a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action occurs during a countrywide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, in response, have countered with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders criticized the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader said the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.